|
A brilliant beacon of Japanese
linguistics has been extinguished. We mourn this loss of a good friend and a faithful supporter of our Journal, whose keen advice and always willingly provided assistance we will be sorely missing for many years to come. Akio Kamio is best known for his ground-breaking work in
pragmatics. He developed the theory of territory of information
in order to explain why certain locutions are pragmatically impossible
in Japanese under certain conditions. Thus, for instance, in Japanese
one cannot state anything directly about another persons private
state (of mind or body). Rather than saying to a person: You are
sad, one has to limit oneself to expressing ones opinion of
the others state, e.g. by saying: To me, it looks like youre
being sad. Hence, all such expressions of direct intervention,
even if they are grammatically and semantically correct, and seem to obey
all of the rules, cannot be properly produced, because they pragmatically
impinge upon another persons territory of information,
that is to say, on information that the addressee controls. Akio Kamios
theory (which is generally valid, and thus not only concerns Japanese
phenomena of language use) has met with acclaim, ever since its first
publication in Japanese (based on his 1987 Tsukuba University dissertation)
saw the light (Joohoo no nawabari riron [Theory of the territory of information],
Tokyo, Taishukan, 1990). Subsequent publications in English in the Journal
of Pragmatics (The theory of territory of information: The case
of Japanese, 1994, Journal of Pragmatics 21(1):67100) and
Territory of information in English and Japanese and psychological
utterances, 1995, Journal of Pragmatics 24(3):235264), and
not least the book that Akio Kamio published in 1997 with John Benjamins
Publishing Company in Amsterdam/Philadelphia, entitled Theory of territory
of information (=Pragmatics and Beyond, Vol. 48) represent his successful
attempt to introduce pragmatic thinking into the study of Japanese as
well as of other languages. Over the years, the theorys impact has started to reach out further and further, as many young and mature scholars in their work adopted the viewpoint that Kamiosensei had advocated. The present Focus-on Issue, which we have entitled, in honor of Akio Kamio, Particles and Discourse: The Territory of Information, bears ample testimony to this fact, vide the frequent references to, and quotations from, Akio Kamios work that adorn its pages. The niche that Professor Akio Kamio has created for his theory is thus by no means empty, even after its creator left us. But it will be a long time before the field of pragmatics and of Japanese linguistics recovers from this severe loss. We honor the Kamios memory, and while in mourning, extend our profound sympathies and condolences to the members of their families, as well as to their close and remote friends and colleagues, both in Japan and abroad. J.L. Mey |